वेंस का फ़ोन और बिगड़ गई बात… नेतन्याहू ने बताया कि इस्लामाबाद वार्ता क्यों विफल रही – iran us israel middle east war Islamabad talks failed JD Vance Netanyahu mdsb ntc
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday that the US-Iran talks in Islamabad not only broke down, but also ended with a call. He blamed Washington’s reaction for this, which it saw as Iran’s violation of the terms of the ceasefire.
Netanyahu told his cabinet that he had appointed US Vice President JD Vance Had talked to. Vance informed him about this from his plane while returning from Pakistan after the agreement was not reached.
Netanyahu said, “I spoke with Vice President JD Vance yesterday. He told me in detail about the progress made in the talks. According to him, the United States had come to the conclusion that iran Has failed to fulfill an important condition related to ceasefire. That condition was to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
His statement shows that the immediate reason for the breakdown of talks was not just related to the nuclear issue, but to maritime access and Hormuz. However, Netanyahu also mentioned Washington’s main and non-negotiable demand regarding Iran’s nuclear program.
“He also told me that the bigger issue is to remove all enriched material and to decide that there should be no further enrichment in the coming years. There should be no enrichment inside Iran.”
Last week Vance said that islamabad The US failed to reach an agreement with Iran even after 21 hours of talks, despite continuous efforts to achieve success.
The US administration says talks broke down when Iran refused to accept Washington’s main demands that it give up any path to producing nuclear weapons and reduce its enrichment facilities.
President Donald Trump reiterated the same stance on Sunday, saying that Iran will never have nuclear weapons and that the failure of talks would tehran Held responsible for K’s refusal to accept that demand.
What do experts say?
Analysts say the talks may have broken down under the pressure of conflicting expectations and inconsistent ‘red lines’. middle east And intelligence expert Danny Citrinovich said a practical agreement was still possible, which could include limited uranium enrichment under strict conditions, a time-bound freeze, and intensive monitoring, as had been the case in previous Oman backchannel agreements.
However, Netanyahu’s statement points to a much tougher US stance, effectively demanding that everything be taken out and nothing stay in, meaning no enrichment of any kind be allowed inside Iran for years, and possibly decades.
This contradiction highlights the gap which Islamabad’s talks could not bridge. On one hand, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that both sides were just a few inches away from signing a ‘Memorandum of Understanding’ (MOU). At the same time, Netanyahu insisted that the talks suddenly broke down on the issue of observing ceasefire and access to Hormuz. These are two contradictory things. One which points towards an agreement that was almost reached, and the other which points towards demands which were impossible to fulfill. Shows two different cracks present in the same failed negotiation.
Since the breakdown of this conversation, tension has increased significantly in this area. This also includes America’s action, under which it has tried to impose a maritime blockade on ships traveling through the Strait of Hormuz, which has increased the risk of a major conflict.
—- End —-
